MODI
Mst. Gulab Kunwar – Appellant
Versus
Askran – Respondent
2. The facts out of which this appeal arises have been narrated at length in that order and need not be repeated fully. It is enough to state that the plaintiffs case was that Jethmal, father of the defendant respondent, had taken the suit shop on rent from the plaintiff by a rent-note dated the 22nd February, 1932, the rent settled being Rs. 5/P.m. After Jethmals death, his son, who is the defendant respondent, continued to pay the rent for some time but thereafter failed to pay it with the result that the plaintiff gave him a notice on the 25th June, 1946, asking him to quit within seven days of the receipt of the notice and in default to be liable to pay rent at an enhanced rate of Rs.20/- per mensem. The defendant did not comply with the notice and, therefore, the plaintiff brought the suit, out of which this appeal arises, on the 17th December, 1946. The defendant contested the suit on all possible pleas and I have already disposed of all of them except one by my order dated the 7th January, 1955
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.