SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 372

MODI
Mst. Gulab Kunwar – Appellant
Versus
Askran – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sumerchand, for Appellant; Chandmal, for Respondent.

Modi, J.—This is a second appeal by the plaintiff Mst. Gulab Kunwar in a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment. My order dated the 7th January, 1955, shall form part of this judgment.

2. The facts out of which this appeal arises have been narrated at length in that order and need not be repeated fully. It is enough to state that the plaintiffs case was that Jethmal, father of the defendant respondent, had taken the suit shop on rent from the plaintiff by a rent-note dated the 22nd February, 1932, the rent settled being Rs. 5/P.m. After Jethmals death, his son, who is the defendant respondent, continued to pay the rent for some time but thereafter failed to pay it with the result that the plaintiff gave him a notice on the 25th June, 1946, asking him to quit within seven days of the receipt of the notice and in default to be liable to pay rent at an enhanced rate of Rs.20/- per mensem. The defendant did not comply with the notice and, therefore, the plaintiff brought the suit, out of which this appeal arises, on the 17th December, 1946. The defendant contested the suit on all possible pleas and I have already disposed of all of them except one by my order dated the 7th January, 1955









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top