SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 103

MODI, WANCHOO
Tekchand – Appellant
Versus
Banwarilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Vyas, for Petitioner; Sumerchand, for Non-petitioner No. 1; Kansing, Dy. Govt. Advocate

Modi, J.—This is a petition by Tekchand under Art. 226 of the Constitution praying for a writ of Certiorari in connection with the rejection of his nomination paper.

2. The petitioner is a resident of Karanpur which is a municipality under the Rajasthan Town Municipalities Act, 1951, (No. XXIII) of 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the Rajasthan Act). The case of the petitioner is that he stood as a candidate for the municipal elections of the Karanpur municipality, which were scheduled to be held on the 5th Dec, 1955, and filed his nomination paper from Ward No. 3 for that purpose Opposite parties Nos 1 to 3 also filed their nomination papers from the same ward. On the day fixed for the scrutiny of the nomination papers, opposite party No. 1, Banwarilal, objected to the nomination paper of the petitioner on certain grounds which are not material for the purposes of the present application. The Returning Officer who is opposite party No. 4 accepted this objection and rejected the nomination paper of the petitioner. Consequently, the petitioner has comes forward with this petitioner and he prays that his nomination paper was wrongly rejected by the Returning Officer, and, therefore, w
































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top