SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 377

DAVE
Lumbaram – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not available

Dave, J.—This reference comes on the report of the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, dated the 16th of the August 1955.

2. The facts giving rise to it are that four persons namely Lumbaram, Kheraj, Pitha and Ghewaria were arrested by the Police on 2nd of May 1955 because they were suspected of committing the murder or one Nawlaram Jat on the previous day. After investigation, the Police challaned three of them. Against the fourth namely Lumbaram it was reported that the evidence against him was not sufficient for his prosecution and, therefore, he should be discharged. This negative, report against Lumbaram was rejected by First Class Magistrate, Jodhpur on the ground that on evidence was recorded till then in the court. He ordered that the accused would stand his trial along with others. Against this order, Lumbaram filed an application in revision in the court of Sessions Judge, Jodhpur. The learned sessions Judge has expressed a doubt if the procedure adopted by the Magistrate is correct. He has requested this court to lay down the procedure to be followed in such cases.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the Magistrate should have either accepted the police repor










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top