Bhandari, J.—This is an appeal on behalf of the plaintiffs appellants who have filed a suit for the possession of the house property described in the plaint situated in Jaipur City, The plaint filed by the plaintiffs Bhonri Lal and his son Gordhan Lal is somewhat complicated, but the learned counsel for the appellants, C.L. Agrawal, has clarified the position taken up by the plaintiffs on the basis of which they claim the possession of the property in dispute. For the proper understanding of the case following pedigree table is necessary—

Nanulal

Motilal

Bansidhar(Defendant No. 1) Bhonrilal(Plaintiff)

Gordhanlal (Plaintiff) Shri Kishen Ram Kishen

Motilal had sold the property in dispute to Jagannath respondent by the sale deed dated the 7th August, 1942, for Rs. 860/-. Thereupon, Bhonrilal and Gordhanlal instituted a suit against Bansidhar and Jagannath in the court of Sub-Judge Jaipur City on 6th October, 1942 praying that the property alienated was the ancestral property in the hands of Motilal and as the alienation was without legal necessity it should be declared null and void. The learned Sub-Judge decided on the 7th May, 1953, that the sum of Rs. 499/- out of the sale consid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document