SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 41

RANAWAT, BAPNA
Sardar Kulwant Singh – Appellant
Versus
A. A. S. T. A. , Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Agrawal, for Petitioners; C.B. Bhargava, Dy. Govt, Advocate

Bapna, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur Region, invited applications for certain routes by a notification published in the Rajasthan Gazette of 15th January, 1952, and again on 14th March, 1953. One of the routes, for which applications for stage carriage were invited, was the Jaipur-Gangapur route. 96 persons applied for stage carriage permits on this route. The Regional Transport Authority by its resolution dated 6th August, 1953, granted 19 permits to 17 persons, and rejected the rest of the applications. Dulichand, Anand Ram Kabra, Amiruddin, Maya Betwal. Mahadeo Ghanshyam and Bansilal Govind Sahai filed six separate appeals to the Appellate Authority under sec. 64, clause (a) of the Indian Motor Vehicles Act, urging that the refusal of permits to them by the Regional Transport Authority was erroneous and that a permit for one stage carriage should be granted to each one of them. By two judgments of 8th May, 1954, all the six appeals were accepted and each one of the appellants was granted a permit for one stage carriage. Sardar Kulwant Singh. Rahimuddin, and Asan Dass, three of the 17 persons, who wer
















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top