SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 330

WANCHOO, MODI
Bhoor Chand – Appellant
Versus
State Of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Hastimal, for Petitioner; Government Advocate

Modi, J—This is a petition by Bhoorchand under Art. 226 of the Constitution and arises under the following circumstances.

2. The petitioners case is that he had obtained the lease of some2400 bighas of land from jagirdar of Sanwarla, Tehsil Siwana, by a deed, dated 3rd December, 1952 that the had been carrying on the work of manufacture of salt over 1-1/2 acre out of the area mentioned above for the last four years and invested round about Rs. 10,000/- over such manufacture, He also states to have applied, but without success so far, for a licence, to the General Manager, Central Excise and Salt, Government of India, for the purpose of manufacturing salt over a larger area but contends that so far as the existing area, to which he has confined the manufacturing operations is concerned, namely, the one and half acre, he is perfectly within his legal rights as such manufacture is covered by a press-Dote, dated the 23rd April, 1948, issued by the Government of India under sec. 6 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, (No. I) of 1944. The effect of this press-note, briefly put is that the Government in their desire to step up the production of indigenous salt and to attain self-sufficiency































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top