SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1955 Supreme(Raj) 162

ROOP NARAIN, KANWAR BAHADUR
Chain Singh – Appellant
Versus
Bishan Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Munilal Vakil, for Applicant; Umrao Chand Vakil, for Respondent

This is an appeal against the appellate order of the Additional Commissioner,Jodhpur, dated 23rd August, 1954 by which he upheld the order of the trial as well as that of the appellate court about: the presentation of certain documents by the plaintiff after the framing of issues.

2. We have gone through the record of the case and have heard the learned counsel for the parties, It appears that the plaint and the written statement were filed on 18-11-1953 and 23-12-53 respectively along with some documents by the parties. Subsequently the plaintiff filed the replication on 18th January, 1954, and issue were framed on 20th January, 1954, After the issues had been framed the Court allowed the plaintiff to present other documents on the 1st February, 1954. The contention of the learned counsel for the appellant is that according to Rule 24(2) of the rules framed under Sec.8 of the Rajasthan Revenue Courts (Procedure and Jurisdiction) Act, 1951, the court should not have allowed the plaintiff to present these documents at such a late stage of the proceedings unless good cause was shown to the ratification of the court for the non-production thereof at the first hearing. It is also urged

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top