SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 65

WANCHOO, BAPNA
Laxminarain – Appellant
Versus
Chief Panchayat Officer, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.P. Tyagi, for petitioner

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application by Laxminarain against the Chief Panchayat Officer, Rajasthan, and two others. He has prayed for a writ of mandamus directing the Chief Panchayat Officer to carry out his duties under the Panchayat Act and Rules.

2. The fact, which have given rise to this application, are these—

There is a Panchayat in Sahawa. Elections to that Panchayat were held on the 19th of November, 1954, and 12 Panches were elected on that day. The same date was fixed for the election of the Sarpanch also; but when the election of the Sarpanch began, these was a disturbance, and that election was postponed to the 5th of January, 1955, under rule 5 of the Panchayat Election Rules. On that day, two names were proposed namely that of the applicant Laxminarain, and of the opposite party Shivnarain. After sometime, however, Shivnarains party left the place, and thereafter the Returning Officer declared Laxminarain elected unopposed. Then he submitted a report to the Chief Panchayat Officer under rule 17 of the Panchayat Election Rules mentioning the names of the Sarpanch and the Panchas. The Chief Panchayat Officer instead of notifying the names, started questioning the report,









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top