SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 228

MODI
Amar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chaturbhuj – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Babalal, for appellant; Haraklal, for respondents

Modi, J.—This is an appeal by the defendant Ratanlal in a suit for redemption of mortgage. Ratanlal died during the pendency of the appeal and he is represented by his son Amar Singh.

The respondents, who were plaintiffs in the trial court, brought the suit on the allegations that Mst. Parwati, the widow of Bherondas had mortgaged the suit house with Ratanlal for Rs. 801/- on Svt.1974 Pos Sudi 7, and further sum of Rs. 199/- was borrowed by her from the mortgagee. The plaintiffs case further was that Mst. Parwatis husband Bherondas was the great grandson of Naraindas and that the plaintiffs were the descendants of Harakchand and Moolchand, being their sons and grandsons and that Harakchand and Mool Chand were the grandsons of Naraindas and they were, therefore, the next reversioners of Mst. Parwati and as such were entitled to bring a suit for redemption of the suit property. The plaintiffs further alleged that the defendant Ratanlal had assigned his rights to one Anraj, defendant No. 2 on the 23rd of February, 1931, and had made over possession of the suit house to the latter along with the relevant document. The plaintiffs, therefore, prayed that redemption be allowed to them on p




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top