SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 3

BAPNA, SHARMA
G. K. Tandon – Appellant
Versus
Judicial Commissioner, State of Ajmer – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Mahendra Singh, for appellant

Bapna, J.—This is an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. G.K. Tandon, petitioner, alleges that he was a stenographer in the office of the Judicial Commissioner, Ajmer, in the grade of Rs. 80/5 120/10-2/220, but his services were transferred to the office of the District Judge, Ajmer, by the Judicial Commissioner Ajmer, on 2nd March, 1951. Thereafter by an order of the Judicial Commissioner dated 31st May, 1952, the lien of his previous post was also transferred. The petitioner made certain representations to the Judicial Commissioner, as his chances of future promotion were likely to be affected by the transfer to the office of the District Judge, and subsequent transfer of his lien. These representations were rejected at first by order of the Judicial Commissioner dated 1st February, 1955, and later on by order of the Judicial Commissioner dated 12th July, 1956, who declined to reopen the previous decision without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case. The petitioner thereafter thought that his transfer may have been due to any adverse entry in his Character Roll and made an application to the District Judge to afford him a copy of any adverse ent










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top