SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 149

WANCHOO, DAVE
Duduwala & Company – Appellant
Versus
Industrial Tribunal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kistoormal and Yashwant Singh, for applicants; Chandmal, for opposite party No. 2

Wanchoo, C.J.—These are three applications for issue of a writ of certiorary under Art. 226 of the Constitution against the order of the industrial Tribunal at Jaipur.

2. We propose to decide them by one judgment as the paints raised in them are common. It seems that disputes are going on between Messrs Duduwala and Company on the one hand and their employees on the other, represented by Khan Mazdoor Congress Bhilwara, a registered Union of workers. In one of the cases the dispute was referred to the Tribunal on the 16th of June, 1956, in the other on the 25th of August, 1956, in the third on the 4th of September, 1956. Soon after the parties had appeared before the Industrial Tribunal, applications were nude both on behalf of the employers and the Union for appearance through certain representatives. The Union applied for appearance through Shri R. P. Ladha, a practising advocate. The case of the Union was based on sec. 36 (1) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and Shri R.P. Ladha was allowed to represent the Union in view of that provision. The employers, who are the applicants before us, prayed that they might be represented through Shri Y. S. Nahar, also a practising lawy











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top