SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 34

BAPNA, SHARMA
Vijai Singh – Appellant
Versus
Regional Transport Authority, Jaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.L. Agarwal, for petitioners; J.P. Jain, for respondents Nos. 2—4 and 6—8

Bapna, J.—This is a petition under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The case of the five petitioners, M/s. Vijai Singh,Roormal, Nizam-uddin, M/s Jagdish Narain Om Prakash, and Hanuman Bux Pareek, leaving aside irrelevant matters, is that they along with 17 others held permits for the Jaipur—Alwar route, which were due to expire on 30th September, 1956. They applied for their renewal on or about the 11th July, 1956. The grievance of the petitioners is that instead or renewing the permits their applications for renewal were advertised in the Rajasthan Gazette of 30th August, 1956, and objections were invited. Their further grievance is that the Regional Transport Authority in its meeting, which took place on the 29th of September, 1st of October, and 5th of October, 1956, recorded a resolution that the traffic needs on this route had increased, and there should be 9 trips from each side between Jaipur and Med. It was recorded that this required 20 buses to run daily on this route, and provision had to be made for weekly holidays to the staff, for leave to the staff, for break downs, for extra traffic on account of fairs and marriages, for reserve parties etc., and, therefore,























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top