BAPNA, SHARMA
Norati, Mst. – Appellant
Versus
Abhai Karan – Respondent
2. The respondent obtained a decree for recovery of Rs. 5078/- from the court of the Civil Judge, Sambhar on 20th December, 1944 and the appeal of the defendant was dismissed by the District Judge, Jaipur on 19th January, 1946 on merits. The defendant filed a second appeal on 18th April, 1946. It was dismissed for default of appellant on 8th September, 1948. The first application for execution of the decree was made on 16th September, 1949 against Mst. Norati and others, legal representatives of the judgment-debtor. The second application was made on 21.2.53. An objection was raised on behalf of the judgment-debtor that the application was barred by time because the earlier application filed on I6th September, 1949, was made after the lapse of three years of the decree of the District Judge which had been passed on the 19th January, 1946. It was contended that the dismissal of the second appeal by the High Court for default of appellant did not give a fresh start of limitation as it could not be considered to be a decree or a final order.
3. Reliance was placed on the case of Batuk Nath vs. Munni D«i (1)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.