SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 187

BAPNA, SHARMA
Norati, Mst. – Appellant
Versus
Abhai Karan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
K.C. Sanghi, for appellants; P.C. Bhandari, for respondents

Bapna, J—This is a first appeal by the judgment-debtor in execution proceedings.

2. The respondent obtained a decree for recovery of Rs. 5078/- from the court of the Civil Judge, Sambhar on 20th December, 1944 and the appeal of the defendant was dismissed by the District Judge, Jaipur on 19th January, 1946 on merits. The defendant filed a second appeal on 18th April, 1946. It was dismissed for default of appellant on 8th September, 1948. The first application for execution of the decree was made on 16th September, 1949 against Mst. Norati and others, legal representatives of the judgment-debtor. The second application was made on 21.2.53. An objection was raised on behalf of the judgment-debtor that the application was barred by time because the earlier application filed on I6th September, 1949, was made after the lapse of three years of the decree of the District Judge which had been passed on the 19th January, 1946. It was contended that the dismissal of the second appeal by the High Court for default of appellant did not give a fresh start of limitation as it could not be considered to be a decree or a final order.

3. Reliance was placed on the case of Batuk Nath vs. Munni D«i (1)






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top