SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 235

RANAWAT, BHANDARI
Anokhmal – Appellant
Versus
Chief Panchayat Officer, Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
V.P. Tyagi, for petitioner; R.A. Gupta, for State

Ranwat, J.—This an application under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India

2. The petitioner is one Anokhmal of village, Choru, in Tehsil Uniara district Tonk, His case is that a village panchayat was established at Choru under the provisions of the Rajasthan Panchayat Act, and the elections of Panchas and Sarpanch of the said Panchayat were held on the 21st of October, 1955, and respondents Nos. 3 to 17 were declared elected. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that notice under Rule 4 of the Panchayat Election Rules of 1954 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Rules) was published by the Returning Officer on the 14th of October, 1955, and a copy thereof was affixed on the notice board of the Panchayat the same day. Copies of the said notice were also circulated in the village constituting the Choru Panchayat through Patwa-ris on the 15th of October, 1955. Thus the case of the petitioner is that the notice under Rule 4 of the Rules was not announced 7 days before the date of election and the proceedings of election are, therefore, challenged to be invalid. The prayer of the petitioner is that the proceedings of election be declared to be invalid and the Chief Panchayat Office





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top