Based on the provided legal document, the key points regarding the case are as follows:

1. The case involves the abetment of Sati, which is a criminal offense under the Indian Penal Code, specifically under section 306 (!) (!) .

2. The prosecution's evidence primarily relied on the testimonies of police officers, who were believed by the trial court, and the evidence was consistent with the initial report (!) (!) .

3. The accused persons, including Tej Singh and others, actively participated in encouraging and facilitating the Sati procession, which was aimed at aiding Mst. Sarswati in her decision to commit Sati (!) (!) .

4. The court found that the crowd, led by the accused, formed an unlawful assembly with the common object of preventing police interference and aiding Sarswati in her act, thus fulfilling the criteria of abetment (!) .

5. The court held that the actions of the accused, including raising slogans, joining the procession, surrounding the police, and setting fire to the funeral pyre, constituted aiding and abetting the act of Sati (!) .

6. The sentences initially awarded by the trial court were deemed inadequate given the gravity of the offense. The appellate court emphasized that Sati is a barbarous act that has been outlawed for over a century, and a more deterrent sentence is necessary (!) .

7. The appellate court sentenced the convicted accused, including Balchand, Askaran, Maluram, Daluram, and Jeeyaram, to five years of rigorous imprisonment under section 306, with sentences for other sections running concurrently (!) .

8. The appeal of Tej Singh and other accused was dismissed, but their sentences were enhanced to a total of five years of rigorous imprisonment, also to run concurrently (!) .

9. The court directed the District Magistrate to take steps for the arrest and detention of the accused to serve their sentences.

Overall, the judgment underscores the criminal liability of those who aid, encourage, or facilitate the act of Sati, affirming that such acts are unlawful and punishable by law, with appropriate deterrent sentencing.