SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 152

BAPNA
Sardar Manmohan Singh Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Government of Raj. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N.Datt, for Applicant; B.C. Chatterjee, Asstt. Govt. Advocate

Bapna, J.—This is a revision against the decision of the judge, Small Cause Court, Jaipur dated 20th January, 1954.

2. The petitioner filed a suit against the Government of Rajasthan in the Court of Small Causes on the 10th of February, 1953, for recovery of Rs. 375/-on the allegation that he was licensee for the sale of foreign liquors in respect of a Bar & Restaurant situated at Prem Prakash Cinema, and he used to pay a licence fee of Rs. 150/- per year to the Customs & Excise Department. It was alleged that on the 6th April, 1950, the Customs and Excise Department of Rajasthan asked the plaintiff licence-holder to pay a fee of Rs. 1500/- per year instead of the previous fee of Rs. 150/- a year. The plaintiff declined to pay the amount, but he was told that if the did not pay up the amount his Bar & Restaurant would be closed by force. It was then that the plaintiff paid Rs. 375/- for three months under protest to the Customs & Excise authorities on the 7th October, 1950. It was contended that the said fee of Rs. 375/- was an imposition unauthorised by law, and, therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to receive back the amount from the Government of Rajasthan.

3. The Government of R







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top