BAPNA
Sardar Manmohan Singh Nagpal – Appellant
Versus
Government of Raj. – Respondent
2. The petitioner filed a suit against the Government of Rajasthan in the Court of Small Causes on the 10th of February, 1953, for recovery of Rs. 375/-on the allegation that he was licensee for the sale of foreign liquors in respect of a Bar & Restaurant situated at Prem Prakash Cinema, and he used to pay a licence fee of Rs. 150/- per year to the Customs & Excise Department. It was alleged that on the 6th April, 1950, the Customs and Excise Department of Rajasthan asked the plaintiff licence-holder to pay a fee of Rs. 1500/- per year instead of the previous fee of Rs. 150/- a year. The plaintiff declined to pay the amount, but he was told that if the did not pay up the amount his Bar & Restaurant would be closed by force. It was then that the plaintiff paid Rs. 375/- for three months under protest to the Customs & Excise authorities on the 7th October, 1950. It was contended that the said fee of Rs. 375/- was an imposition unauthorised by law, and, therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to receive back the amount from the Government of Rajasthan.
3. The Government of R
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.