SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 183

WANCHOO
Jankidas – Appellant
Versus
Laxminarian – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chandmal for Petitioners; Prakashchandra, for Opposite Party

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is a revision by the plaintiffs whose suit dismissed by the Judge, Small Cause Court, Jodhpur.

2. The plaintiffs suit was briefly this:

Laxminarain defendant had mortgaged his house usufructuary for Rs 700/- to the plaintiffs on the 27th of June, 1953. On the same day, the plaintiffs mortgagees in their turn gave a lease of the house to the defendant mortgagor at Rs. 3/8/- per month, and put the lessee in possession. As the rent was not paid, the plaintiffs filed a suit for arrears of rent and ejectment in the court of Joint Kotwal No. 2, Jodhpur. That suit was fought up to the High Court of the former State of Marwar, and the High Court gave a decree for arrears of rent, but decided that the lessee could not be ejected and the prayer for ejectment was not allowed. The present suit was filed by the plaintiffs in February, 1953, claiming arrears of rent amounting to Rs. 126/- for 3 years preceding the date of suit. The suit resisted by the defendant, who among other pleas raised the objection that the suit was barred under O. II, r. 2, C. P. G. A. preliminary issue appears to have been framed by the Judge, Small Cause Court on this point, and he held that the suit w













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top