Modi, J.—This is a second appeal by the judgment-debtor Chimna and arises under the following circumstances.

2. The respondents Chunnilal and Bakhtawarmal and certain others as plaintiffs filed a suit against the defendant appellant for Rs. 3,073/7/- on the allegation that they had incurred losses with respect to certain transactions for the purchase of gold mohars and silver peties made by them for and at the instance of the defendant and the latter was, therefore, liable to re-imburse them for the losses incurred.

3. The defendant resisted the plaintiffs suit in his written statement, but it is not necessary for the purposes of this appeal to state the details of the objections raised. On the 18th March, 948, the parties entered into a compromise and obtained a decree on its basis. By this compromise decree it was agreed that the defendant would pay a sum of Rs. 700/- on Falgun Sudi 11, Svt. 2004 (corresponding to the 21st March, 1948), and a further instalment of Rs. 1,000/- on the Baisak Sudi 15 (corresponding to 22nd May, 1948). It was further provided that if the defendant had failed to pay Rs. 1,700/- as specified on the due dates, the plaintiffs would be entitled to recover t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document