WANCHOO, MODI
Firm, Rasulji Buxji Kathawala – Appellant
Versus
Income tax Commissioner, Delhi – Respondent
2. The case of the applicant is that it is a registered firm carrying on business of manufacturing and selling Kattha at Udaipur. The Income-Tax Officer, Ajmer, served a notice on the applicant on the 19th of March, 1954, under sec. 34 of the Income Tax Act calling upon him to make a return of his income for the assessment year 1945-46 on the ground that certain income had escaped assessment. The proceedings were later transferred to the Income-Tax Officer, A Ward, Udaipur, who was also designated as Seventh Additional Income Tax Officer. Ajmer. In pursuance of this notice, the applicant filed his return on the 10th March, 1955. At the same time, he took the objection that the Income Tax Officer Ajmer, who had issued the notice under sec. 34, had no jurisdiction to do so, and theref
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.