SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 150

BAPNA
Surjan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Gindorilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.B. Parihar, for Appellant; B.P. Agarwal, for Respondents

Bapna, J.—This is a second appeal in execution proceedings. 2. Kishanlal son of Sedhmal and Shridhar son of Shivprasad obtained a decree against Bhim Singh on the 28th May, 1925, for recovery of Rs. 712/-besides costs and interest. The decree-holders put their decree in execution, and the last application filed by them was so done on 25th January, 1932, which was dismissed on 16th March, 1933, without recovery of any amount. Kishanlal died, and an application was filed on 24th March, 1933, by Gulzarilal as successor in interest of Kishanlal, one of the decree-holders. This application was also dismissed without recovery of any amount on the 14th of August, 1933. The next application was filed by Gulzarilal on behalf of Gindorilal and Madanlal, minor sons of Kishanlal. as their guardian as also on his own behalf on the 4th of May, 1935. Similar applications for execution were presented on 7.2.36 & 8.3.39. The next application was filed on the 2nd of April, 1942, by Gulzarilal and in an accompanying application it was mentioned that the heirs of Kishanlal were his two minor sons Gindorilal and Madanlal under the guardianship of Gulzarilal, and that the names of Gulzari-lal and Badril




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top