BAPNA
Basanti Bai – Appellant
Versus
Mohanial – Respondent
2. One Mohanlal made an application to the S. D. M., Jhalawar, on the 8th of November, 1956, that he was married to one Sunder Bai about 2-1/2 years ago. She was the daughter of Basanti Bai. It was alleged that Sunder lived with him after the marriage, but she was being prevented by Basanti Bai from coming to the petitioner. It was stated that Basanti Bai also did not allow the petitioner Mohanlal or his relations to meet Sunder Bai. It was mentioned that the above facts showed that Sunder was being kept in wrongful confinement. Her age was stated to be 14 years. It was mentioned that under the Hindu Law the petitioner was her guardian. It was prayed that a warrant of search of Sunder Bai be issued, and she may be handed over to the petitioner or set at liberty.
3. Sec. 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure runs as follows:—
"If any Presidency Magistrate, Magistrate Of the first class or Sub-Divisional Magistrate has reason to believe that any person is confined under such circumstances that the confine
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.