SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 121

BAPNA
Basanti Bai – Appellant
Versus
Mohanial – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.C. Sharma, for Respondent

Bapna, J.—This is a reference by the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Jhalawar, and is a typical instance where the powers granted to a Magistrate can be abused in the grossest from.

2. One Mohanlal made an application to the S. D. M., Jhalawar, on the 8th of November, 1956, that he was married to one Sunder Bai about 2-1/2 years ago. She was the daughter of Basanti Bai. It was alleged that Sunder lived with him after the marriage, but she was being prevented by Basanti Bai from coming to the petitioner. It was stated that Basanti Bai also did not allow the petitioner Mohanlal or his relations to meet Sunder Bai. It was mentioned that the above facts showed that Sunder was being kept in wrongful confinement. Her age was stated to be 14 years. It was mentioned that under the Hindu Law the petitioner was her guardian. It was prayed that a warrant of search of Sunder Bai be issued, and she may be handed over to the petitioner or set at liberty.

3. Sec. 100 of the Code of Criminal Procedure runs as follows:—

"If any Presidency Magistrate, Magistrate Of the first class or Sub-Divisional Magistrate has reason to believe that any person is confined under such circumstances that the confine






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top