SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 214

BAPNA, BHANDARI
State – Appellant
Versus
Rehman – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.C. Chaterjee, for State; D.K. Soral, for Respondent

Bapna, J.—This is an appeal by the State against the order of acquittal of Rehman respondent on a charge under sec. 353 of the Indian Penal Code by the Munsif Magistrate, Hindaun by order of 4th of August, 1956.

2. The case for the prosecution is that Mr. Sri Kishen Ahluwalia Deputy Superintendent of Central Excise having headquarter at Bharatpur went on the 7th of September, 1953 to village Kot. He received information that Sullad and his son Rehman had cultivated tobacco but had not paid the excise duty thereon. On the 9th of September, 1955, he decided to go to the house of Rehman and after 2 P. M. went to his house and asked him to show his tobacco. Rehman replied that he had some tobacco with him but he would not show it. Shri Ahluwalia, Deputy Superintendent, was accompanied by Mr. Nand Kishore Maheshwari, Inspector Central Excise, Ramchand Sepoy, Nopa Chokidar and two Motbirs, Kapurchand and Phulchand. Shri Ahluwalia decided to take the search of the house of Rehman, but Dhamman and Rehman obstructed the making of the search and pushed aside Ramchand and Shri Ahluwalia. Shri Ahluwalia fell down and as a result received two injuries, one abrasion and the other a contused wound






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top