WANCHOO, BHANDARI
Kanhaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajastha – Respondent
2. The facts which have led to this petition may be briefly mentioned. Kanhaiyalal had been in service since 1930. A complaint was made against him of the 26th of August, 1952 by on Modu Daroga before the Sub-divisional Officer, Malpura in which it was said that the applicant had taken Rs. 4/- from him, viz, Rs. 1/-- as bribe and Rs. 3/- for getting an application prepared and presented. It was made clear further by Modu in his statement that Rs. 3/--were paid for getting the application prepared through Chiranjilal petition-writer and Re. 1/-- was paid as bribe. It was found on enquiry that Rs. 3/--were actually paid by Kanhaiyalal to Chiranjilal Petition-writer on behalf of Modu. As for the bribe of Rs. 1/-, the Tehsildar was of opinion that the case relating to bribe had not been duly proved. Consequently, the Tehsildar recommended that the applicant should be transferred and his promotion should be stopped for a certain time. This was done by the Tehsildar as the papers were sent to him by the Sub-divisional Officer for enquiry and report. The Tehsildar comp
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.