SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 290

WANCHOO, BHANDARI
Kanhaiyalal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajastha – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Rastogi, for Applicant; C.B. Bhargava, Deputy Government Advocate

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is an application under Art. 226 by Kanhaiyalal who was a peon in Tehsil Malpura against his dismissal.

2. The facts which have led to this petition may be briefly mentioned. Kanhaiyalal had been in service since 1930. A complaint was made against him of the 26th of August, 1952 by on Modu Daroga before the Sub-divisional Officer, Malpura in which it was said that the applicant had taken Rs. 4/- from him, viz, Rs. 1/-- as bribe and Rs. 3/- for getting an application prepared and presented. It was made clear further by Modu in his statement that Rs. 3/--were paid for getting the application prepared through Chiranjilal petition-writer and Re. 1/-- was paid as bribe. It was found on enquiry that Rs. 3/--were actually paid by Kanhaiyalal to Chiranjilal Petition-writer on behalf of Modu. As for the bribe of Rs. 1/-, the Tehsildar was of opinion that the case relating to bribe had not been duly proved. Consequently, the Tehsildar recommended that the applicant should be transferred and his promotion should be stopped for a certain time. This was done by the Tehsildar as the papers were sent to him by the Sub-divisional Officer for enquiry and report. The Tehsildar comp






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top