SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 30

JAGAT NARAYAN, WANCHOO
Goswami Shri Ghanshyamlalji – Appellant
Versus
Collector, Udaipur – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
G.S. Pathak, B.K. Acharya and R.K. Acharya, for Applicant; L.N. Chhangani, Government Advocate

Jagat Narayan, J.—This revision application arises out of a suit under sec. 22, G. P. G. brought by the Collector of Udaipur, in exercise of the powers of the Advocate-General conferred on him by the Government of Rajasthan against Goswami Govindlalji Maharaj and some other defendants including three deities Shri Nathji, Shri Navnit Priyaji and Shri Madan Mohanlalji installed in the temple at Nathdwara. Goswami Govindlalji Maharaj defendant No. 1 is the present manager of the deities. Defendants 3 to 12 are members of an ad hoc committee of management who manage the affairs of the temple along with defendant No. 1. A scheme of management was filed along with the plaint and it was prayed that this scheme might be given effect to under the provisions of sec. 92, C. P. C. In their written statements all the defendants except No. 7 accepted all the allegations made in the plaint and expressed their agreement to the proposed scheme. Defendant No. 7 opposed the scheme and the plaintiff filed an application praying that he may be removed from the array of defendants.

2. The present applicant Goswami Shri Ghanshyamlalji filed an application before the District Judge in whose court the above










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top