SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Raj) 164

G.S.MEHTA, SHYAMLAL
Puranmal – Appellant
Versus
Ramjilal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Surendra Nath Sharma, for Applicant; Ramavtar Gupta, for Opposite Party

This is a revision against an appellate order of the Additional Commissioner, Jaipur, dated 6.8.!956, upholding the decision of the S.D.O., Tijara (Alwar District) in a case which commenced on 2.11.1953, under sec. 7 of the Rajasthan (Protection of Tenants) Ordinance, 1949, and was decided on 14.12.1955 presumably under sec. 186 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955, which came into force on 15.10.1955.

We have beard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have examined the record as well. The applicant Puranmal claimed re-instatement before the trial court with the allegations that in Svt. 2009 he and Ramjilal opposite party were admitted as tenants of the land in dispute by the owner Mst. Kasturi; that in Svt. 2010 he (the applicant) sowed the Kharif harvest ; and that on 20.10.1953 the opposite party Ramjilal deliberately and wrongfully dispossessed him from the land by cutting the Kharif produce himself and later on not permitting him to participate in the Rabi harvest. Ramjilal resisted the claim and pleaded that he himself was admitted as a tenant of the land by Mst. Kasturi, that in Svt. 2009 he allowed Puranmal to share in cultivation, that towards the close of Svt. 2





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top