G.S.MEHTA, SHYAMLAL
Puranmal – Appellant
Versus
Ramjilal – Respondent
We have beard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and have examined the record as well. The applicant Puranmal claimed re-instatement before the trial court with the allegations that in Svt. 2009 he and Ramjilal opposite party were admitted as tenants of the land in dispute by the owner Mst. Kasturi; that in Svt. 2010 he (the applicant) sowed the Kharif harvest ; and that on 20.10.1953 the opposite party Ramjilal deliberately and wrongfully dispossessed him from the land by cutting the Kharif produce himself and later on not permitting him to participate in the Rabi harvest. Ramjilal resisted the claim and pleaded that he himself was admitted as a tenant of the land by Mst. Kasturi, that in Svt. 2009 he allowed Puranmal to share in cultivation, that towards the close of Svt. 2
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.