SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Raj) 140

KANWAR BAHADUR, G.S.MEHTA
Kesra – Appellant
Versus
Bega – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Chaturbhuj Sharma, for Applicant; Bal Krishan Pareek Govt, Advocate

This revision has been filed against the order of the learned Commissioner, Bikaner dated 22.2.56 and arises under the following circumstances :—

2. One Kesra filed a Mukhbiri stating therein that the opposite party Bega and Harchand had encroached upon Government land and unlawfully enclosed the land by raising a compound wall. An enquiry was made by the subordinate courts and it was represented to them by the villagers, Lumberdars etc. that this land was used for the seating of village cattle and the opposite party had made unlawful encroachment on this land of public utility. The Naib Tehsildar proposed that the delinquents be fined Rs. 10/- each and the encroachment should be removed at their cost. This proposal was endorsed by the Tehsildar and the Asstt. Collector accepted the proposal and directed that the encroachment should be removed and the amount of fine as proposed by the Tehsildar be recovered. This order of the S.D.O. some how remained pending in the tehsil and the case was resubmitted to the S. D. O. for orders. Again the S.D.O. passed the same order on 15.9.55. Against this order, an appeal was filed before the learned Commissioner, who by his order in revision dire


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top