SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 208

JAGAT NARAYAN
Kalu – Appellant
Versus
Pyara – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kan Singh, Deputy Government Advocate

Jagat Narayan, J.—This is a reference by the Additional District Magistrate, Udai-pur, recommending that the order of the First Class Magistrate, Rajsamand dated 21.9.57 holding that the applicants are not entitled to the protection under sec. 197 Cr. P.C. be set aside.

2. The facts which have given rise to this application are these. The Village Panchayat Arni ordered the demolition of a platform which they found to have been built on a public way encroaching upon it. The owner of the platform did not demolish it. Thereupon they themselves proceeded to demolish it along with some employees of the Panchayat. A complaint under secs. 148,440,454,390 and 500 I.P.C. was filed against them in the court of the learned Magistrate. The applicants who are the accused persons filed an application claiming protection under sec. 197 Cr.P.C. The learned Magistrate held that they were not entitled to such protection. He did not give any reason in support of his finding. The learned Additional District Magistrate was of the opinion that they were so entitled and has consequently made this reference. He too has not given any reason in support of his recommendation. Sec. 197 Cr.P.C. runs as follows:









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top