DAVE
Babu Ram – Appellant
Versus
Narayan Dass – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are that in the City of Jodhpur there is a house near Gulabsagar whose boundaries are given in the plaint. This house once belonged to Mangilal and Ballabhdas. They rented it out to the defendant-appellant on a rent of Rs.3/- p.m. This rent was,later on,raised to Rs.3/8. The exact dates on which the house was leased out by Mangilal Ballabhdas or the date on which the rent was increased have not been clarified by either party. Mangilal and Ballabhdas brought a suit against the appellant for ejectment, but it was dismissed.
3. The plaintiffs case is that Mangilal and Ballabhdas sold their house to him on 4.7.50. He therefore, brought a suit against the appellant for his eviction treating him as a trespasser, because the defendant did not attorn to him and he also questioned the validity of the house sale in the plaintiffs favour. In that suit, the defendants contention was that he was a tenant from Mangilal and Ballabhdas an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.