MODI
Tilokchand – Appellant
Versus
Lalchand – Respondent
2. The plaintiffs case was that the defendant Lalchand had taken the suit house on rent from the former under a rent-note dated Fagun Sudi 1 Smt. 2004 by which the latter agreed to pay rent at the rate Rs. 13/- per mensem. Their case further was that the defendant had been in arrear, so far as the payment of rent was concerned, to the extent of a sum of Rs.178/- upto the date of suit and that they wanted to effect necessary repairs to the house, and, therefore, they filed the present suit for recovery of the arrears of rent as well as for the ejectment of the defendant.
3. The defendant resisted the suit on certain pleas which are not material at this stage at all, and, therefore, these need not be mentioned.
4. The trial court held, that the defendant had defaulted in payment of rent as alleged by the plaintiffs and accordingly gave a decree in favour of the latter for arrears of the rent amounting to Rs. 178/- as well as for possession. The defendant went in appeal to the learned District Judge who also concurred in the finding of the trial court that rent amounting
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.