SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 249

DAVE
Shri Niwas – Appellant
Versus
Gordhan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K. Acharya, for Shri Niwas and Banarsilal; Kishore Singh, for Gordhan.

Dave, J.—Both these revision applications noted above arise out of the same order of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Churu, dated 3.9.55 and therefore they are disposed of together.

2. The facts giving rise to these applications are that Gordhan plaintiff filed a suit for sale of mortgaged property valued at Rs. 4750/-in the court of the Civil Judge, Churu, on l9.1.52, against three persons namely, Shri Niwas and Banarsilal, sons of Ghasi Ram and Mst. Mani Devi widow of Ram Kumar. An ex parte preliminary decree was passed against the said defendants by the learned Civil Judge, Churu, on 19.5.52. Thereafter, a final decree was also passed on 17.3.53. The plaintiff, decree holder took out execution of the decree. The mortgaged property was put to auction and it was purchased by the decree holder himself. Thereafter, on 7.7.54 an application was presented by defendants Shri Niwas and Banarsilal for setting aside the ex parte decree. It was stated in the application that they were never served with summonses and the ex parte proceedings taken against them were therefore illegal. It was further stated that they had come to know of the decree on 17.6.54 and that the application was theref




















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top