SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Raj) 238

DAVE
Chhaganlal – Appellant
Versus
Kesarlal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
B.K. Bhargava, for Chhaganlal; K.C. Sanghi, for Kesarlal Lalchand

Dave, J.—Both the cross appeals arise out of the same suit and therefore they are disposed of together. They are directed against the judgment and decree of the learned Civil Judge, Tonk, dated the 27th February, 1953, modifying the decree of Munsif Tonk dated 31.10.52 in a suit for mandatory and perpetual injunction.

2. The dispute between the parties relates to a house which is situated in the town of Niwai in a locality which is known as Khari Kui-ka-Bas. It is Common ground between the parties that different portion of the said house are occupied by the parties to the suit. There are two chowks in this house. The property which is in possession of the plaintiffs is situated in the inner chowk. There was an open passage leading from the first chowk to the second chowk.

3. It was averred by the plaintiffs that the said passage between the two chowks was joint property of the parties, that defendant No. 1 Chhaganlal in collusion with defendant No. 2 Ratanlal started constructions on the said joint lane on 12.12.50 and after erecting pillars on both sides of the lane he covered it with stone slabs. Thus, according to the plaintiffs, defendant No. 1 had encroached upon the joint prope
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top