SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Raj) 11

BAPNA, JAGAT NARAYAN
Samdu Khan – Appellant
Versus
Madanlal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
J.S. Chordia, for Appellant; Gumanmal, for Respondent

Bapna, C.J.—This is an appeal in execution proceedings. The respondent Madanlal instituted a suit for dissolution of partnership and rendition of accounts in the court of Civil Judge, Merta. He valued the suit at Rs. 5,250/- and paid court-fee on that valuation according to sec. 7(iv)(f) of the Court fees Act. A preliminary decree was passed on 31st of January 1957. An appeal was filed to the High Court by the defendant, but as reported in Samdu Khan vs. Madanlal (1) it was decided by the Full Bench that the appeal lay to the District Judge. The appeal was consequently submitted to the District Judge and it is said to be pending.

2. As it happened, further proceedings continued in the trial court and a final decree was passed op the 16th of November 1957 in which the defendant Samdu Khan was held liable to pay Rs. 67,089/14/- to Madanlal as a result of the accounting between the parties. The defendant filed an appeal against this final decree in the court of the District Judge, Merta. It is admitted that appeal was rejected for non-payment of court fees and an appeal against that order is now pending in this Court.

3. Madanlal put his decree in execution and certain objections were r









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top