SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Raj) 4

WANCHOO, RANAWAT
Seth Lalchand – Appellant
Versus
Seth Radha Ballabh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
R.K. Rastogi and K.C. Sanghi, for Appellant; P.N. Datta and P.D. Mathur, for Respondent

Wanchoo, C.J.—This is a second appeal by Seth Lalchand in a suit for ejectment and arrears of rent and damages for use and occupation.

2. The suit was brought by Seth Radhaballabh respondent. The case of the plaintiff briefly was that the shop in dispute originally belonged to Bakshi Bhagchand and was purchased by the plaintiff in April, 1917. The shop had been rented out by the previous owner to the defendant appellant at Rs. 21/- per month for a fixed term of three years which expired on the 2nd of March, 1948. The plaintiff requited the shop for his personal use; but as the defendant did not vacate the shop after the period of tenancy was over, the plaintiff served one months notice on him in January, 1949. The defendant did not vacate the shop even then. Thereupon the plaintiff filed this suit with the permission of the Rent Controller who had granted a certificate to the plaintiff to sue for ejectment. The suit was resisted by the defendant on various grounds, most of which are however not material now.

3. Only two points were urged in second appeal when the matter first came before a learned Single Judge of this Court in 1955. These points were:—

(1) That the notice given by the



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top