SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 21

MODI
Abdul Sattar – Appellant
Versus
Jankivallabh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Abdul Jalil, for petitioners; Roshanlal, for opposits party

Modi, J.—This is a revision by the petitioners Abdul Sattar and Abdul Rehman against an order of the Munsiff City Jodhpur dated the 15th September, 1958, in a proceeding under sec. 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, which raises an interesting question as to the interpretation of the words "a civil court of competent jurisdiction" occurring in that section.

2. Only a few facts need be mentioned to bring out the controversy which has arisen in this case. The petitioners have instituted an application under Sec. 145 Cr. P.C. against the opposite parties with respect to a certain plot of open land lying outside the Siwanchi gate in the city of Jodhpur. This application was filed in the court of the City Magistrate Jodhpur (No. I). As the learned Magistrate did not find himself in a position to decide as to which of the contending parties was in possession of the land in dispute at the date of the preliminary order, he referred the question of possession for determination to the Munsiff, Jodhpur City, under sub-sec.(l) of sec. 146. It appears that after some evidence was recorded before the Munsiff, an objection was raised before him that as the valuation of the land was more than t











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top