SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Raj) 219

SARJOO PROSAD, CHHANGANI
Laxmi Narain – Appellant
Versus
Madanlal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Prakashandra, for appellants; Haraklal Manihar, for Respondents

Chhangani, J.—This is an appeal by the plaintiffs in a suit for redemption and partition of property.

2. As the counsel for the parties ate not disputing the findings of facts arrived at by the lower court and have raised contentions only in regard to the legal effect of these facts found by the lower court, we consider it unnecessary to refer in any great detail to the pleadings of the parties. It will be sufficient to state the facts as found by the trial court.

3. The pedigree table of the parties will be helpful in properly appreciating the facts of the case.

Bhagwandas



Shyamdas Jamnadas Narayandas Haridas



Shankerlal Moolraj Murlidhar (adopted)Madanlal (adopted) (Deft. No. 1).



Jainarain Banshidhar


Laxminarain(Pltf. No. 1)



BalkishanPltf. No. 2 GordhandasPltf No. 3

4. The disputes relates to a house which, once the joint family property of the four sons of Bhagwandas, fell to the share of Narayandas and Haridas on partition. Narayandas and Haridas effected a further partition of this house in Svt. 1946 and each got half share in the house. Haridas however died in Svt. 1954 and Narayandas inherited the half share of Haridas in the house and became its full owner


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top