SARJOO PROSAD, CHHANGANI
Laxmi Narain – Appellant
Versus
Madanlal – Respondent
2. As the counsel for the parties ate not disputing the findings of facts arrived at by the lower court and have raised contentions only in regard to the legal effect of these facts found by the lower court, we consider it unnecessary to refer in any great detail to the pleadings of the parties. It will be sufficient to state the facts as found by the trial court.
3. The pedigree table of the parties will be helpful in properly appreciating the facts of the case.
Bhagwandas
Shyamdas Jamnadas Narayandas Haridas
Shankerlal Moolraj Murlidhar (adopted)Madanlal (adopted) (Deft. No. 1).
Jainarain Banshidhar
Laxminarain(Pltf. No. 1)
BalkishanPltf. No. 2 GordhandasPltf No. 3
4. The disputes relates to a house which, once the joint family property of the four sons of Bhagwandas, fell to the share of Narayandas and Haridas on partition. Narayandas and Haridas effected a further partition of this house in Svt. 1946 and each got half share in the house. Haridas however died in Svt. 1954 and Narayandas inherited the half share of Haridas in the house and became its full owner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.