SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 74

MODI
Nathia – Appellant
Versus
Sonia – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Not available

Modi, J.—This is a reference by the Additional District Magistrate Alwar and raises an interesting question of procedure.

2. The material facts may be stated briefly as follows. The petitioners Nathia and another instituted a complaint against the opposite parties Sonia and others under secs. 323 352 and 504 I. P. C. in the court of the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Rajgarh, on the allegations that the accused while purporting to build on their land on the 23rd January, 1953, had really encroached on a public thoroughfare, and on the petitioners remonstrating against that, the accused Sonia and Bhoria beat them with lathis and the other accused Kana and Hukama threw stones at them as a result of which they received a number of injuries. It was further alleged that some other persons residing in the village intervened between the parties otherwise the petitioners would have been given a still severe beating. The petitioners appear to have got themselves medically examined. On the 29th January, 1953, the Sub-Divisional Magistrate transferred the case to the court of the First Class Magistrate, Rajgarh, and process was issued against the accused. The accused appeared and their statements





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top