CHHANGANI
Balloram – Appellant
Versus
Firm, Seth Uttamchand Bishandas – Respondent
2. The facts of the case broadly stated are as follows:—
The plaintiff-petitioners, Balloram and Varyamal claim to be the proprietors of a firm Bansiram Balloram which at one time carried on business in Sibi Baluchistan, now a part of Pakistan. The defendant-non-petitioner no. 1, Seth Uttamchand Bishandas is a firm carrying on business as commission agents and bankers at Meerut in Uttar Pradesh. The defendants no. 2 to 6 who are non-petitioners in the revision petition, viz. Kishandas, Ramdas, Pehumal, Tekchand, Joturam and Jethmal, are said to be its partners.
3. The plaintiffs case is that they appointed the defendants firm as their commission agents for the purchase of jaggery in November-December, 1946 and in that connection, paid various sums of money to the defendant firm either in Pakistan or at Meerut.
According to the plaintiffs, it was agreed that the defendants wo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.