SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 115

CHHANGANI, SARJOO PROSAD
Mst. Aysha Bai – Appellant
Versus
Daleep Singh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
N.L. Jain and S.T. Porwal, for Applicants; V.P. Tyagi, for opposite-party

Sarjoo Prosad, C.J.—The petitioners have applied for review of our decision dated 4th January, 1960 given in First Appeal No. 68 of 1954.

2. The appeal arose out of a suit for recovery of Rs. 5,000/- from the defendant. In the written statement, the defendants admitted the claim to that extent, but at the same time, pleaded that there were further transactions between the parties on mutual and current account, as a result of which the entire amount due to the plaintiff had been paid off and that in fact, on adjustment the defendants were entitled to recover a further sum of Rs. 6,319/12/9 from the plaintiff for which the defendants preferred to a counter-claim in the suit and paid court-fee thereon. The suit was instituted on the 1st February, 1951. The trial court dismissed the claim of the plaintiff, but decreed the counter-claim of the defendants for a modified sum of Rs. 4,240/2/9 on 31st July, 1954. Against that decree, an appeal was filed to this Court on 18th October, 1954 and eventually decided by us under the judgment which is sought to be reviewed. It should be observed that when the appeal was filed, the defendants-respondents also preferred a cross-objection in which the







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top