SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 99

MODI
Shankerlal – Appellant
Versus
Jethmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Singhvi, for Appellants; Krishna Murari, for Respondents

Modi, J.—This appeal by the defendants Shankerlal and another is directed against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Bhilwara, upholding the judgment and decree of the Civil Judge;, Bhilwara, in a suit for refund of earnest money.

2. The material facts are these. On the 27th March, 1953, defendants Shankerlal and Arjunlal agreed to sell, and the plaintiffs to purchase the suit house for a sum of Rs. 12,000/- vide Ex. 1. The plaintiffs paid a sum of Rs. 700/- as earnest money then and there and the rest of the sale consideration was agreed to be paid at the time of the registration of the sale-deed, and it was further agreed between the parties that the sale would be completed within one month of the date of the agreement. The case of the plaintiffs as disclosed in the plaint was that the suit land originally belonged to one Bherunlal Gelda of Udaipur and the defendants had stated that they would settle the dispute with Bherunlal with respect to it and it was on this account that a months time was agreed to for the completion of the sale. But the defendants had failed to resolve their dispute with Bherunlal and had further failed to complete the sale. Consequently on the

































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top