JAGAT NARAYAN
Ibrahim – Appellant
Versus
Phoolchand – Respondent
2. The facts giving rise to this application are these. Gafoor, respondent No. 2 mortgaged a house situated at Pali with possession in favour of Phool Chand respondent No. 1 by means of a registered mortgage-deed dated 23.1.54. On the same date he executed a rent-note in favour of the mortgagee taking the mortgaged house on rent from him. The rent fell in arrears and Phool Chand brought a suit for recovery of arrears of rent and for ejectment against Gafoor which was decreed. When the decree for ejectment was being executed Ibrahim filed an objection claiming to be in possession of the house as owner and praying that warrant for delivery of possession should not be issued without investigating his claim. This application was rejected by the executing court on 11.9.58 on the ground that it is not open to a third party to apply for investigation of his claim and that his claim could only be investigated upon an application by the decree-holder made under O. 21 R. 97. Warrant for delivery of possession was then issued. When the Ameen went to the spot to deliver posses
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.