DAVE
Sobhag Mal – Appellant
Versus
Tehsil Panchayat, Pipalda, Kotah Distt. – Respondent
2. The petitioners house in village Mohanpura is adjacent to that of respondent No. 3 Shri Moolchand. He had constructed a latrine in his house in the early part of the year 1954 but it was ordered to be demolished by the Gram Panchayat, Mohanpura and accordingly it was removed. Thereafter on 31st December, 1954, he presented an application to the same Gram Panchayat to obtain permission for constructing another latrine according to the plan submitted by him. The Up-Sarpanch inspected the site and made a report that the plan submitted by the petitioner was not objectionable and he may be permitted to construct the latrine as desired by him. On 3.1.55, the Sarpanch on behalf of the Gram Panchayat, Mohanpura, accorded sanction asked for to the petitioner. Respondent No. 3 thereupon presented an application before the Gram Panchayat raising certain objections to the constructions which were allowed to be made by the petitioner. On 21st February, 1955 the members of the Gram Panchayat considered all the objections raised by respondent No. 3
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.