SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 241

DAVE
Sobhag Mal – Appellant
Versus
Tehsil Panchayat, Pipalda, Kotah Distt. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Sagar Mal, for Petitioner; P.N. Dutt, for Non-petitioner No.3

DAVE, J.—This is a writ application by one Sobhag Mal resident of village Mohanpura, in district Kotah, under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India.

2. The petitioners house in village Mohanpura is adjacent to that of respondent No. 3 Shri Moolchand. He had constructed a latrine in his house in the early part of the year 1954 but it was ordered to be demolished by the Gram Panchayat, Mohanpura and accordingly it was removed. Thereafter on 31st December, 1954, he presented an application to the same Gram Panchayat to obtain permission for constructing another latrine according to the plan submitted by him. The Up-Sarpanch inspected the site and made a report that the plan submitted by the petitioner was not objectionable and he may be permitted to construct the latrine as desired by him. On 3.1.55, the Sarpanch on behalf of the Gram Panchayat, Mohanpura, accorded sanction asked for to the petitioner. Respondent No. 3 thereupon presented an application before the Gram Panchayat raising certain objections to the constructions which were allowed to be made by the petitioner. On 21st February, 1955 the members of the Gram Panchayat considered all the objections raised by respondent No. 3









Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top