SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 139

DAVE, MODI
A. K. Vyas – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.M. Vyas, for Petitioner; Kan Singh, Govt. Advocate

MODI, J.—This is a writ application by A. K. Vyas under Art. 226 of the Constitution by which he seeks to attack the order of the State Government dated the 21st November, 1958 (Ex.1) removing him from service.

2. The petitioner was a Superintendent, Archaeology and Museums, first at Udaipur in 1955 and then at Jodhpur from January, 1956 until the date of his removal. The petitioners case put very briefly is that there was bad blood between him and Mr. S. P. Shri-vastava, who was the Director of Archaeology and Museums at all material times. This bad blood was occasioned by the fact that both the petitioner and Shri Shrivastava were candidates for the headship of the Department of Archaeology and Museums and although the petitioner thought that he was far better qualified than Mr. Shrivastava, the latter stole a march over him. It is further alleged that as a result of this enmity Mr. Shrivastava started making complaints against the petitioner, on account of which, on the 8th of October, 1956 the petitioner was suspended. On the 7th of January, 1957, he was served with a charge sheet which contained 3 charges. We shall mention the relevant charges at the proper place. Mr. B.D. Thak
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top