SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 69

DAVE
Jagdish – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
H.P. Gupta, for Petitioner; P.N. Dutta, for Non-Petitioners 2 to 8

DAVE, J.—This is an application in revision by complainant, Jagdish, against the order of the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sikar, dated the 30th November, 1959.

2. The facts giving rise to it are that on the 16th July, 1957, the present petitioner, Jagdish, filed a complaint in the court of the Magistrate first class, Neem-ka-Thana against 11 accused for offences under secs. 452, 323, 504. and 147 of the Indian Penal Code. It was stated in the complaint that in village Ajitgarh where he was residing he had a house and near that house he had his Nohra in which a bath-room was constructed. In the Nohra there was a door which led to a public well situated nearby. It was alleged that on the 20th June, 1957, all the 11 accused mentioned in the complaint committed criminal trespass in the said Nohra having made preparations to cause hurt to him. He proceeded to say that after having entered the Nohra, the accused started demolishing the bath-room and when the complainant asked them not to do so, they abused and assaulted him. It was further alleged that the accused had knowingly broken a few things and dismantled certain constructions which caused him a loss amounting to about Rs. 5







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top