SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RANAWAT, DAVE, JAGAT NARAYAN
Tikuda – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.N. Dutta, for Tikuda; Raj Narain, Asstt. Govt. Advocate; D.K. Soral, for Respondents

DAVE, J.—This is a reference arising out of an application in revision by one Tikuda against the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Jaipur District, dated the 15th of October, 1959.

2. The facts giving rise to it are that on the 24th of June, 1959, the petitioner presented an application to the Superintendent of Police, Amber, requesting him to take proceedings against Ghasi Balai and 6 others under sec. 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Superintendent of Police forwarded that application to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Govindgarh. After investigation, the Station House Officer, Govindgarh, presented a report in the court of the Sub Divisional Magistrate, Amber, requesting him to take proceedings against Ghasi and 6 others under sec. 107 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It was stated in the said report that a field (Khasra No. 24), appertaining to what was known as Kothi Nadiawali, was in the possession and cultivation of the petitioner Tikuda since Smt. year 2009, that on the 23rd of June, 1959, the petitioner had to put in a few cart-loads of manure in the said field, that the non-petitioners Ghasi and his six companions went to the said field, armed








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top