MODI
Hari Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Returning Officer, Nawalgarh – Respondent
2. It is common ground that the petitioners were among the candidates who offered their candidature for the impugned election. Respondents Nos. 2 to 9 are members of this municipal board having been declared successful at this election. Respondent No. 1 is the Returning Officer, who conducted the election, while respondent No. 10 is the municipal board Mukandgarh. The petitioners have taken up a large number of grounds in their writ application which according to them vitiated this election; but it is necessary to mention only those which were debated at the bar of this Court, the rest having been given up. These grounds may be summarised as follows: First, the Returning Officer acted illegally in entrusting the preparation of the voters list to the municipal board and in doing so he contravened rule 6 of the Rajastha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.