SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Raj) 332

MODI, BHANDARI
Gajanand – Appellant
Versus
Sardarmal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.C. Mathur, for Applicant; N.M. Kasliwal, for Opposite party

BHANDARI, J.—This revision application has been referred by a Single Judge of this Court to a Division Bench for decision as in his opinion there were important points of law involved in this case.

2. Sardarmal, Mangilal and Rajmal, all residents of Agra filed a suit for the recovery of Rs. 9,500/- against Gaja Nand alleging that the three plaintiffs carried on in partnership the business of Hazarilal Ganeshilal. The defendant carried on business at Sambhar, which at the time of the filing of the suit formed part of the States of Jaipur and Jodhpur. The plaintiffs claimed that a sum of Rs. 9,500/- was payable by the defendant to the plaintiffs in respect of the silver transactions detailed in the plaint. The suit was filed on the 23rd of August, 1948, and it may be mentioned that at that time the plaintiffs could not sue the defendant in the name of the Firm as the Firm was situated outside the Sambhar Shamlat Area where the provisions of the Indian Civil Procedure Code as such did not apply. One of the plaintiffs Magan Lal died on the 21st of December, 1951, but no application was made to bring his legal representatives on record. On the 21st of May, 1952, an application was made b






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top