SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Raj) 246

Rajasthan High Court
Modi & Chhangani, JJ.
Anandmal - Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan - Respondents
D.B. Civil Writ application No.56 of 1958
Decided On : December 08, 1961

Advocates Appeared:
M.B.L. Bhargava, for Petitioners; Kansingh G.A., for Respondent

Headnote:(a) States Reorganisation Act, Secs. 225 and 2(a) —Notification issued by former State of Ajmer remained alive and could be acted upon by new State of Rajasthan.(b) States Reorganisation Act, S.120 —Appropriate Government in respect to area if former State of Ajmer is Rajasthan and not Central Government, after reorganisation.(c) Wages—Minimum Wages Act, Secs. 3, 26 and 27—Fixation of minimum wages for employments listed under Part I before amendment or which may be later added should be throughout State unless for special and specific reasons it is to be restricted.

       

MODI, J.—This writ application by Anandmal and another under Art. 226 of the Constitution is directed against a notification No. 9/2/56-Lab. dated the 10th July, 1957, issued by the Government of Rajasthan under sec, 3 read with sec. 5 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948, (Act No. XI of 1948) (hereinafter called the Act) by which certain minimum piece rates of wages with respect to employment in Gota Kinari establishment as specified in Schedules A to F appended to this notification were enforced in the Ajmer area, that is, the area which comprised the State of Ajmer immediately before the 1st November, 1956, and it is prayed that this notification be quashed as being illegal and discriminatory.

2. The petitioners are the proprietors of a Gota factory in Moti Katra, Ajmer. It is common ground between the parties that by a notification No, 9/2/56- Lab, dated the 11th. July, 1956 (Ex. I) published in the Gazette of India, Sec. III, dated the 21st July T956, the Chief Commissioner Ajmer acting under sec. 27 of the Act directed that at item No 16 of part I of the Schedule to the Act, "Employment in Gota Kinari Establishment" be added, with the result that the schedule in its application to the Ajmer State as it then was, must be deemed to have been amended accordingly with effect from the date of the notification. It is further common ground that by another notification No.9/2/56 Lab. dated the 6th September, 1956 (Ex. 2) issued under clause (a) of sub sec. (1) of sec. 5 the Act, the Chief Commissioner appointed a Committee to hold an inquiry and advise him in respect of the fixation of minimum wages in the employment in Gota Kinari Establishment in that State and the Committee was directed to submit its report within two months from the date of this order. It is not disputed that the term of this Committee was extended from time to time until it submitted its report on the 10th July, 1957 (Ex. 3), to which we have referred above and which is impugned before us, the Governor of the State of Rajasthan, fixed the minimum piece rates of wages as specified in the six schedules-appended to the notification for the area which constituted the State of Ajmer immediately before the 1st day of November, 1956, and which since that date became part and parcel of the State of Rajasthan as it was constituted under the States Reorganisation Act (No.37) of 1956, and as it exists today.

3. It may be pointed out at this place that it is no longer disputed, though it was controverted in the petitioners application (see paragraph seven thereof) that by a notification No. F. 1 (6) Lab./56/10267 dated the 31st October, 1956 issued by the Secretary to the Government in the Labour Department by order of His Highness the Raj Pramukh of the State of Rajasthan, as it then was under sec. 27 of the Act, employment in Gota industry was also added to part I of the schedule to the Act. The position therefore, at the time the impugned notification was issued indisputably was that employment in Gota industry had become a scheduled employment under the Act (being in part I of the schedule) throughout Rajasthan. By the notification which is questioned before us, minimum wages for those employed in the Gota industry, however, came to be fixed for, what we may, for the sake of facility of reference, call only the Ajmer area of the present State of Rajasthan, and no similar action for those employed elsewhere in the same industry in this State has yet been taken, though it is obvious that employment in the said industry also stood incorporated in part I of of the schedule of the Act as early as the 31st October, 1956, in the remaining part of the State.

4. It is in these circumstances that the petitioners challenge the validity of the aforesaid notification of 1957 as illegal and unconstitutional. The grounds of attack against this notification are four in number:—

1. The notifications dated the nth July, 1956, and the 6th September, 1956, referred to above issued by the Chief














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top