JAGAT NARAYAN, J. —This is a plaintiffs revision application against an appellate order of the District Judge, Bikaner, confirming an order of the Civil Judge, Ratangarh, holding that he did not have jurisdiction to try the suit.

2. The plaintiff is a firm carrying on business at Ratangarh. The defendant is also a firm carrying on business at Kota. Banshi Dhar a partner of the plaintiff firm went to Kota on 17.7.53 and placed an order for the supply of 11 bags of Dhania, 32 bags of Mungphali, 40 bags of rice and 200 bags of Jowar with the defendant firm. These goods, with the exception of 200 bags of Jowar, were consigned by the defendant by rail to Ratangarh. The consignment was made in the name of the defendant and the railway receipt was endorsed in favour of a bank at Ratangarh. Two Hundis were sent with the railway receipt to the bank. One was for Rs. 4,262/- which represented the price and other charges of the goods which were consigned and the other was for Rs. 3,000/-. The bank was instructed to present these Hundis to the plaintiff at Ratangarh and in case they were honoured it was to endorse the railway receipt in favour of the plaintiff and to deliver it. The Hundis were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document