SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 169

DAVE, CHHANGANI
Seth Ramrichhpal Sirya – Appellant
Versus
Ajmer Traders – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
S.K. Jindal, for Appellant; Chandmal Lodha, for Respondent

CHHANGANI, J.—The appellant Seth Ramrichpal Sirya, on behalf of himself and as manager and karta of the joint Hindu family known as Tilokchand Dilsukhrai, resident of Ajmer, has filed this appeal under sec. 39 of the Arbitration Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer, dated 16.2.1960, over-ruling the appellants objections to the validity of the award and making award a rule of the Court and directing a decree in terms of award.

2. The facts giving rise to the appeal are briefly these.

3. The respondent M/s. Ajmer Traders, a registered partnership firm, Naya Bazar, Ajmer, through its partner Birdhichand of Ajmer put in an application in the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer, on 18th March, 1958, against Seth Ramrichpal Sirya of Ajmer, praying for a judgment and decree on the basis of an award. The respondent applicants case was that the respondent and the appellant having had some dispute in regard to certain shop situated outside Railway Good-shed, Ajmer, known as "Sirya Market Ajmer" referred their dispute for arbitration to Shri Krishna Gopal Garg under an agreement dated 25.7.1956. The arbitrator Shri Krishna Gopal Garg gav




























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top