SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Raj) 171

MODI, SHINGHAL
Puttolal – Appellant
Versus
H. H. Maharaja Dhiraj Shri Sumersinghji of Kishengarh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
M.B.L. Bhargava, for Appellant; B.K. Acharya, for Respondent

MODI, J.—This is an appeal by the plaintiff Puttolal Sharma against a judgment and decree of the Senior Civil Judge, Ajmer, dated the 21st January, 1960, by which he recorded a compromise alleged to have been arrived at between the parties and dismissed the plaintiffs suit in accordance with it, leaving the parties to bear their own costs.

2. The material facts leading up to this appeal may shortly be stated as follows. The plaintiff was a building contractor at Ajmer. The defendant is Maharaja Sumer Singh, Ruler of Kishengarh which was a neighbouring independent State in 1947 and 1949. The plaintiffs case was that as a result of an agreement between the parties, he had built two palaces for the said Ruler of Kishengarh, one at Ajmer and the other at Kishengarh and had also undertaken certain other works of a subsidiary nature for the defendant, the details of which were mentioned in the plaint and that he had repeatedly asked him and a Colonel A. Sharman, who was his controller of personal estates and was looking after all the personal properties of the defendant in that capacity, to render a full and complete account of all the works executed by the plaintiff and to make full and











































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top