MODI, SHINGHAL
Puttolal – Appellant
Versus
H. H. Maharaja Dhiraj Shri Sumersinghji of Kishengarh – Respondent
2. The material facts leading up to this appeal may shortly be stated as follows. The plaintiff was a building contractor at Ajmer. The defendant is Maharaja Sumer Singh, Ruler of Kishengarh which was a neighbouring independent State in 1947 and 1949. The plaintiffs case was that as a result of an agreement between the parties, he had built two palaces for the said Ruler of Kishengarh, one at Ajmer and the other at Kishengarh and had also undertaken certain other works of a subsidiary nature for the defendant, the details of which were mentioned in the plaint and that he had repeatedly asked him and a Colonel A. Sharman, who was his controller of personal estates and was looking after all the personal properties of the defendant in that capacity, to render a full and complete account of all the works executed by the plaintiff and to make full and
(8) Mishrilal Vs. Sobhachand (AIR 1956 Bom 569)
(1) Husain Yar Beg Vs. Radha Kishan (AIR 1935 All. 137)
(3) Kuppuswami Vs. Pavanambal (AIR 1950 Mad. 728)
(4) M. Hasain Vs. Yusuf Husain (AIR 1956 All. 121)
(5) Athappa Vs. Periasami (AIR 1956 Mad. 344)
(13) Laraiti Devi Vs. Sita Ram (AIR 1957 All. 820)
(14) Union of India Vs. Raghubir Saran (AIR 1957 All. 120)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.